Schizopoffy

|
|
When the Evil Twin Piques.
by
Jon Dunmore © Oct 2005.
Wearing
his Darwinism on his sleeve, director David Cronenberg assails
his audience with a movie which is surface "pulp thriller,"
played hard against a psychological cyclorama; a simplistic
tale which careens against the cerebral precepts of Survival
of the Fittest, Natural Selection and Freudian sublimation.
(Any more big words, or are we done for the day?...)
Loosely
screen-storied by Josh Olson, from the graphic novel of
the same name (by John Wagner and Vince Locke), A History
Of Violence centers around leisurely Tom Stall (Viggo
Mortensen), living the Life Idyllic in a town which elevates
podunk to an art form. Running the town diner with the urgency
of a napping camel, Tom is well-liked by his bumpkin employees
and patrons, and long-married to wife Edie (steaming Maria
Bello, so readily-sexed that every man in the audience immediately
pegged her as a work of fiction - but we can dream, can't
we?).
During
expository scenes establishing Tom's still-lusty relationship
with his spouse of 17 years, and his teen son's status as
the school's bully-fodder (both sub-plots artfully invoking
the word "pussy"), Cronenberg tweaks the Norman
Rockwell 'til the syrup almost bleeds from the celluloid,
setting up his audience in eerily-expectant treacle, to
ensure that the subsequent dose of savagery will scythe
like razor-wire
Into
Tom's diner walks the criminal element from the disturbing
opening sequence of the film - in a parallel universe, these
two guys would be Lance Henriksen and Matthew McConaughey
- who attempt to divest Tom of his languidly-earned cash
at gunpoint. Big mistake! With the suaveness of a panther,
Tom efficiently dispatches the two felons, illustrating
he is somewhat less somnolent than his aw-shucks drawl implies.
Like
George Lucas ignoring his actors for fear of clutter on
his green-screen, at this point in the film, Cronenberg
opts to ignore intrinsic realities which would clutter his
movie's thematic sweeps, to wit, The Media and The Law.
The Media, which is instrumental in alerting Tom's presence
to characters from his unsavory past, suddenly vanishes
altogether once it serves its purpose of conjuring those
characters into the storyline; indeed, the absence of an
intrusive, ubiquitous press - which, in our reality, would
descend rapaciously on a multiple murder story before the
last body's chalk outline is drawn - leaves us stranded
in an insular universe of the film-maker's creation, and
we shift uneasily in our seats for the lack of plausibility
this absence fosters.
Like
an Armani-suited vulture, out of Tom's past swoops the sinister
Carl Fogarty (Ed Harris), all one-eyed and unnerving, and
calling Tom "Joey from Philly" with the insistence
of a jabbing finger to the chest, presaging Tom's descent
into his dark half.
Though the trailers tout this "mystery" aspect,
we are ahead of the characters in identifying that Tom is
indeed a re-wrought persona of professional killer "Joey,"
and the movie is more a study in Tom reconciling his adopted
pacifism with his innate violent streak. Guess it's like
riding a bike; after sublimating it for almost two decades,
it is his dormant Art of Killing which saves Tom's life.
After
loosing his inner beast so publicly, Tom finds that his
whipping-boy son has opened a can of whoop-ass on
his bullies. Whether he does this due to his father's latent
"violent genes" or because his father set a decisive
example, we are not to know (Nature vs. Nurture?), as a
father-son confrontation leads only to a smack upside the
head from Tom. When the son goes Outlaw Josey Wales in a
later scene, the question looms larger, but it is not Cronenberg's
purview to answer his thematic questions, only to
pose them. Matter of fact, he avoids wrestling his themes
to the ground like the Stall family avoids open discussion
on Tom's sordid past, leaving us, once again, shifting uneasily.
In
his outré universe (Naked Lunch, Crash, eXistenZ),
Cronenberg is king - some may contend dauphin, to David
Lynch - of suspenseful, disturbing vignettes, left-field
sex, and unapologetic brutality that allows him loving close-ups
of decimated faces and mutilated nose cavities; of these
aspects, there are plenty in A History of Violence,
as well as Tom's underlying themes of alienation and betrayal
(with his wife), hero-worship and anger (from his son) and
self-doubt and intrinsic dependence (on his bad self - not
Shaft bad, but actually bad). Yet we cannot
reconcile or forgive the haphazard conclusion tacked onto
this otherwise engaging drama, starting its fall from grace
at the point where the seemingly one-man Sheriff's Department,
Sam (Peter MacNeill, recently Detective Horvath of Showtime's
Queer As Folk), exhibits embarrassment in questioning
Tom - who was only at the quintuple-murder stage at that
point! - which serves to highlight the absence of high-level
judicial inquiries regarding Tom's hurricane of violence;
the Cronenberg "Ignoring Quotient" in overdrive.
By
the time Tom faces his brother, Richie Cusack (a dangerously-smarmy
William Hurt, doing his best Gary Oldman), the film degenerates
into an Adam West Batman episode, in which the Villain,
who has every opportunity to eradicate the Hero expeditiously,
instead plots a prolonged and gruesome death for him, with
a lot of Villain-talk - if only the darned Hero would cooperate
and stop that infernal escaping! The last scenes seem to
be a visceral payoff for the bloodthirsty contingent, and
leave us with unanswered - and maybe unanswerable - questions
regarding the future of Tom's estranged family dynamic.
Because of Cronenberg's almost cult status, gut-level response
is to bow down in "we're not worthy" fashion,
but in assessing this movie purely as entertainment - rather
than multi-layered social commentary - it is probably given
more credit than its due.
A
history of violence? Isn't this Viggo fella the same guy
who spent the last four years raging postal at Helm's Deep
and Pelennor Fields, slaughtering thousands of face-challenged
evil-kins alongside a dandy archer and fey wizard? You can
run, but you can't hide, Aragorn, Son of Arathorn!...
END
|
|